CURRENT ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
2016 EPI score
F (Very Poor) |
D (Poor) |
C (Fair) |
B (Good) |
A (Excellent) |
A+ (Superior) |
<60 | 60-80 | 80-90 | 90-95 | 95-100 | >100 |
Finland: still under pressure
Following strong economic performance earlier, Finland has suffered a unique confluence of cyclical and structural shocks since the global financial crisis in 2008. The EPI grades Finland’s current economic performance at C level, with the EPI score projected to be close to 87.3% in 2016.
Weak external demand and the parallel declines of Nokia and the paper industry have reduced exports, moreover, the recession in Russia has taken a further toll on exports.
GDP is projected to increase 0.4% in 2015, partly driven by higher private consumption growth as lower inflation and “mortgage amortization holidays” offered by major banks to households. The unemployment level increased to 9.5% in 2015 from 8.7% the year before. The government is providing some fiscal stimulus and kept the budget deficit at 3.2% in 2015. Inflation remains at zero, driven by low commodity prices and disinflationary environment in Europe.
The 5-Minute Economist projects Finland’s EPI score to improve only gradually in the to 90.7%, or a B- level, by 2020, driven by economic growth acceleration and lower unemployment rate, despite a gradual pick-up in inflation.
ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE HISTORY
EPI COMPONENTS PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Inflation
Unemployment
Budget deficit
GDP Growth
EPI DATA FOR FINLAND
Year | Inflation Rate (%) | Unemployment Rate (%) | Budget Deficit as a Percent of GDP (%) | Change in Real GDP (%) | Raw EPI Score (%) | Change From Previous Year | Raw EPI performance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 3.0 | 9.9 | -6.7 | 5.6 | 99.5 | 5.1 | A+ |
2001 | 2.7 | 9.2 | -4.9 | 2.6 | 95.6 | -3.9 | A- |
2002 | 2.0 | 9.2 | -4.0 | 1.7 | 94.5 | -1.1 | B+ |
2003 | 1.3 | 9.1 | -2.3 | 2.0 | 94.0 | -0.5 | B |
2004 | 0.1 | 8.9 | -2.2 | 3.9 | 97.1 | 3.1 | A |
2005 | 0.8 | 8.5 | -2.6 | 2.8 | 96.1 | -0.9 | A |
2006 | 1.3 | 7.8 | -3.9 | 4.1 | 98.9 | 2.8 | A |
2007 | 1.6 | 7.0 | -5.1 | 5.2 | 101.8 | 2.8 | A+ |
2008 | 3.9 | 6.4 | -4.2 | 0.7 | 94.6 | -7.2 | B+ |
2009 | 1.6 | 8.3 | 2.5 | -8.3 | 79.2 | -15.3 | D+ |
2010 | 1.7 | 8.5 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 90.2 | 11.0 | B- |
2011 | 3.3 | 7.8 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 90.4 | 0.2 | B- |
2012 | 3.2 | 7.7 | 2.2 | -1.4 | 85.5 | -4.9 | C |
2013 | 2.2 | 8.2 | 2.6 | -0.8 | 86.2 | 0.7 | C |
2014 | 1.2 | 8.7 | 3.2 | -0.6 | 86.3 | 0.1 | C |
2015 | -0.2 | 9.4 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 88.0 | 1.7 | C+ |
2016 | 0.4 | 8.8 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 90.3 | 2.3 | B- |
2017* | 1.4 | 8.5 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 89.2 | -1.1 | C+ |
2018* | 1.6 | 8.3 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 90.0 | 0.7 | C+ |
2019* | 1.8 | 7.8 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 91.0 | 1.1 | B |
2020* | 1.9 | 7.3 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 91.8 | 0.8 | B |
2021* | 2 | 6.9 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 92.2 | 0.4 | B |
2022* | 2 | 6.6 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 92.6 | 0.4 | B |